GTX 1060 METRO LAST LIGHT BENCHMARK 1080P

This lands the 780 Ti about 10FPS ahead of the 1050 Ti, and below the 970 SSC and 380X. At 1080p, weвЂ™re seeing an average framerate of about 90FPS, with lows at 59 1% and 49 0.1%.

GTX 1060 METRO LAST LIGHT BENCHMARK 1080P

1080, 480, 1060Д¬all of Duty: Black Ops III is next, operating at 1080p and 1440p with High settings. 780 Ti Call of Duty: Black Ops III Benchmark vs.

Vulkan mostly posts similar scaling to last time, with an AVG FPS of about 40, with lows at 27 and 25FPS.

Jumping to the modern price-equivalent of the 780 Ti, performance goes up to around 125 to 130FPS AVG, or about 3x the 780 TiвЂ™s modern performance. The GTX 970 SSC also does well here, with a 70FPS AVG. This plants us just under the RX 470вЂ™s average, and about 20FPS below the GTX 1060 and RX 480. The 780 Ti operates an average framerate of 45 at 1440p with OpenGL, with lows at around 31FPS and 25.7FPS. Although theyвЂ™re not shown in this OpenGL and Vulkan comparison, the lows for the 780 Ti fall to 33FPS and 25.6FPS вЂ“ not particularly impressive.ДЎ440p/Ultra is more of the same. FPS goes from about 64 AVG to about 53FPS AVG. With Vulkan, our averages negatively scale on the 780 Ti. The 780 Ti sits between the 10 Ti, and is well below the RX 470, 480, and GTX 1060. Moving on to DOOM, weвЂ™ll look at both OpenGL and Vulkan performance on the GTX 780 Ti.ДЄt 1080p/Ultra with OpenGL, weвЂ™re seeing a performance output of approximately 64FPS AVG on the 780 Ti вЂ“ still plenty playable for 1080p gaming, but comparatively, not so impressive. GTX 780 Ti DOOM Benchmark вЂ“ Vulkan & OpenGL The RX 480, for instance, blows the 780 Ti away in 1440p performance, and the GTX 1060 Gaming X nearly doubles the 780 Ti. High resolution gameplay has changed significantly in the past two generations, even for mid-range $200 cards.

Strictly looking at same-brand generational jaunts, the $140 to $160 1050 Ti offers effectively equivalent gaming performance in Battlefield 1 to the once-king 780 Ti.Д«eing that the 780 Ti was a $700 card, a modern price-equivalent would be just about where the GTX 1080 is вЂ“ that lands us at such a high framerate that weвЂ™d really have to look at 1440p for a better understanding of differences.ДЄt 1440p/Ultra with Battlefield 1, we see the GTX 1080 landing at around 116FPS AVG, compared to the GTX 780 Ti Kepler card at 38.7FPS AVG. WeвЂ™re above the RX 460В by about 15FPS, a pretty meaningful gap, and below the RX 470В by about 15FPS. Although nVidia has improved its frametime consistency generationally, everything since Kepler has been tightly timed.Д¬omparatively, this performance puts us adjacent to the GTX 960 SSC pre-overclocked card, and about tied with this generationвЂ™s GTX 1050 Ti.

The reference GTX 780 Ti performs at about 58FPS AVG at 1080p/Ultra in Battlefield 1, with lows reasonably close at 47.7FPS and 45.3FPS. WeвЂ™ll look at DOOM for Vulkan performance later on. We only tested Battlefield 1 using DirectX 11, since Dx12 has generally shown poor performance in frametimes in our previous tests. Note that the 780 Ti results were run before some recent major patches, and are therefore directly comparable to our previous results. Our Battlefield 1 GPU benchmarks are defined in the initial BF1 GPU review, found over here.

Gtx 1060 metro last light benchmark